In 2014, Professor Christine M. Korsgaard (Harvard) delivered the Uehiro Lectures organised by the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics. The title of the lecture series was: 'Fellow Creatures: The Moral and Legal Standing of Animals'. This is the third of her three lectures (AUDIO ONLY). (See below for the abstract.) Abstract: The instability in human attitudes about the moral standing of animals is reflected in our lanaws. Animal welfare laws offer animals some legal protections, but those protections do not take the form of animal rights. Partly as a consequence, these laws are often ineffective. Organizations with an interest in activities that are harmful to animals, such as factory farms or experimental laboratories, often manage to get their own activities exempt from the restrictions or the animals they deal with exempt from the protections. On the other hand, many people find the idea that animals either should have legal rights or do have natural rights absurd. Rights, many believe, only exist among those who can stand in reciprocal relations to each other, and who can have obligations correlative to their rights. Animals do not stand in such relations to us, or to each other. In this lecture I will argue for a Kantian conception of a kind of legal rights for animals is not subject to these objections.